| Model Number |
XTACK-160-H |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Insert (1316); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
12/15/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device labeling notes the following: the current overstitch¿ endoscopic suturing system (ess) instructions for use (ifu) addressed the known and potential event of "overstitch-resistance met advancing anchor exchange into anchor exchange channel" as follows: warning: do not introduce the device with the needle body in its open position.Warning: ensure appropriate suture slack has been created for desired suture path and pattern.Advance anchor exchange and/or manipulate endoscope to create suture slack.Anchor exchange will not install anchor onto the needle body: i.Ensure there is sufficient suture slack, and the suture outside endoscope is not entangled.Ii.Ensure anchor exchange is properly positioned in alignment tube of needle driver.Warnings: only physicians possessing sufficient skill and experience in similar, or the same techniques should perform endoscopic procedures.Note: ensure suture is not tangled after removal from the cartridge.Caution: do not use when valve covers are closed as suture drag will be increased.Caution: if resistance is encountered when advancing the anchor exchange through the working channel of the endoscope, reduce the endoscope angulation until the device passes smoothly.Ensure that there is sufficient space for the needle to open.Additional information: the investigator determined that a device history record (dhr) review is required for this complaint, as there are no other complaints against this lot number and this allegation, af05185.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
After deploying 1st suture the next suture appeared not to deploy, once the equipment was removed it was discovered that the tack was stuck in the plastic catheter.Surgery was completed with a competitor's device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Supplement #01 medwatch submitted to the fda on 10/apr/2023.Additional information: the investigator determined that a device history record (dhr) review is required for this complaint as it was a reportable event.The subject product met all specifications and requirements in effect at the time of manufacture.There are no other complaints against this lot number and this allegation, af05185.Device evaluation summary: the device was returned to the apollo device analysis laboratory on 26/jan/2023.An xtack was returned with a tack stuck in the liner.There were two tacks and the suture returned.Engineering visually inspected the returned device.Tack number 2 drilled the helix through the channel liner at the bendy portion of the scope.The complaint has been verified as the tack is stuck in the catheter.Lab analysis was able to replicate the reported event of "resistance met advancing anchor exchange into anchor exchange channel", as the tack is stuck in the liner.The user effect of "resistance met advancing anchor exchange into anchor exchange channel" is known and labeled possible adverse event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|