• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ M50 AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM; SEE H.10

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ M50 AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM; SEE H.10 Back to Search Results
Model Number 443624
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/20/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Common device name: system, test, automated antimicrobial susceptibility, short incubation a device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using the bd phoenix¿ m50 automated microbiology system that there was misidentification.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: the application specialist requires instrumental verification associated with his support for identification problem investigations.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
"a failure for mis-identification of results was reported on a phoenix m50 instrument (p/n 443624, s/n (b)(6) ).An application specialist requested verification of the m50 instrument while troubleshooting a mis-identification issue.The field service engineer (fse) arrived onsite to troubleshoot the instrument.The fse performed an instrument check, completed general cleaning of the instrument and cleaning of the optics.Colormetric calibration and verification was completed.The fse also replaced normalizers and lightsource and the expiration date was approaching.The instrument was found to operating as expected and preventative measures only were carried out.No samples were expected to be received as part of this complaint, and therefore no samples were returned and no returned material investigation could occur.Dhr review is not required for this complaint as this complaint does not allege an early life failure or failure at installation and the configuration has changed since release from manufacturing due to service repairs/pms.Service history review was completed and revealed no further cases related to this failure mode, outside ot the one already described above.Complaints for results are within statistical control for the month of january 2023.The upper control limit was not breached.Quality will continue to monitor the results complaints for phoenix m50 instruments.No new risks or hazards, or changes to existing risks/hazards, were identified as a result of this complaint.H3 other text : see h.10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using the bd phoenix¿ m50 automated microbiology system that there was misidentification.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: the application specialist requires instrumental verification associated with his support for identification problem investigations.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PHOENIX¿ M50 AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM
Type of Device
SEE H.10
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key16374985
MDR Text Key309599517
Report Number1119779-2023-00130
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LON
UDI-Device Identifier00382904436247
UDI-Public00382904436247
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K131331
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/14/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number443624
Device Catalogue Number443624
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/29/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-