• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; MITRAL VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; MITRAL VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX26A
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Unintended Collision (1429); Perivalvular Leak (1457); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Dyspnea (1816); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist, approximately 6 months, 22 days post tmvr procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve in a surgical ring, the valve presents paravalvular leak (pvl).While treating the pvl with a plug, the ventricular disc was 'inside' the sapien 3 valve, interfering with the leaflet and slightly worsening central.It was decided to perform a valve in valve (vinv) procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist, approximately 6 months, 22 days post tmvr procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve in a surgical ring, the patient presented with shortness of breath, and anemia.The valve presents paravalvular leak (pvl) due to high deployment.While treating the pvl with a plug, the wire 'could not stay out of the s3 valve', and it entered the open cell and then into lv.Through a 8fr torqvue sheath, the team deployed a plug in the pvl.However, the ventricular disc was 'inside' s3 valve interfering with the leaflet and slightly worsening central mitral regurgitation.However, pvl was completely gone.It was decided to perform a valve in valve (vinv) procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 valve with nominal +4 cc prep.Per procedural information obtained from salesforce, the final valve position post deployment was 90/10 (ao/lv) and the valve was post-dilated due to pvl as seen on tee.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to h6 based on additional information.The device was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation, however, a device history record (dhr) review was done and did not reveal any manufacturing nonconformance issues that would have contributed to the event.A lot history review was performed and revealed no other complaints relating to the reported event were identified.The instructions for use/training manuals were reviewed for guidance/instruction involving the esheath and delivery system usage.Based on the review of the ifu/training manuals, no deficiencies were identified.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaints for deployed valve exhibits central regurgitation, interventional device interacts with non-edwards device, malpositioned thv, and paravalvular leak were unable to be confirmed as no medical record or imagery were provided.As reported, 'approximately 6 months, 22 days post tmvr procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve in a surgical ring, the patient presented with shortness of breath, and anemia.The valve presents paravalvular leak (pvl) due to high deployment [90/10: a/v].While treating the pvl with a plug, the wire 'could not stay out of the s3 valve', and it entered the open cell and then into lv.Through a 8fr torqvue sheath, the team deployed a plug in the pvl.However, the ventricular disc was 'inside' s3 valve interfering with the leaflet and slightly worsening central mitral regurgitation'.Per ifu, valve malposition requiring intervention is a known potential adverse event associated with the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.In this case, it was reported that the valve was positioned 'high'; however, review of procedural information revealed the final valve position post deployment was 90/10 (ao/lv), which is within the recommended position per training manual.Without further information or imagery, a root cause is unable to be determined at this time.Per the instructions for use (ifu), paravalvular leak (pvl) is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.While the field perceived malposition (high deployment) contributed to the reported event; there is insufficient evidence provided to confirm the causality of the event.The valve was deployed at 90:10 (a/v) position, which is within ew recommended position.In this case, the valve was deployed inside a pre-existing mitral ring.The mitral ring is typically non-circular in shape (c or d-shaped).Deploying a circular valve (s3u) inside a non-circular ring may create a gap leading to pvl.While a definitive root cause was unknown, it is possible that patient factors (pre-existing ring shape) may have contributed to the reported event.As reported, while treating the pvl with a plug, the wire 'could not stay out of the s3 valve', and it entered the open cell and then into lv.The team proceeded with deployed the plug in the pvl; however, the ventricular disc was 'inside' s3 valve interfering with the leaflet and slightly worsening central mitral regurgitation.Based on provided information, the negative interaction between the plug and valve can be attributed to procedural factors (guidewire mismanagement).In this case, the plug used to treat the reported pvl interacted with the pre-existing valve and resulted in central mitral regurgitation.As such, available information suggests that procedural factors (non-edwards device interaction) may have contributed to the complaint event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
MITRAL VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key16380927
MDR Text Key309599408
Report Number2015691-2023-10824
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPU
UDI-Device Identifier00690103201338
UDI-Public(01)00690103201338(17)250309
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9750TFX26A
Device Catalogue Number9750TFX26A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/19/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/15/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/23/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-