|
It was reported that at the end of an unspecified angio procedure, a flexor raabe guiding sheath began to unravel as the user was pulling the device over a stiff wire from the patient.The device was able to be removed and replaced with a different unspecified sheath to finish the case.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.There was not any unintended section of the device left inside the patient.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: it was reported that at the end of an unspecified angio procedure, a flexor raabe guiding sheath began to unravel as the user was pulling the device over a stiff wire from the patient.The device was able to be removed and replaced with a different unspecified sheath to finish the case.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.There was not any unintended section of the device left inside the patient.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook in three segments held together by the inner coil.The first segment was 25cm in length from the hub to point of separation, the second segment was 16cm in length, and the third segment 62.5cm in length from the distal tip to the separated point.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.The instructions for use (ifu) provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: "warnings: reinsertion of dilator prior to removal of flexor sheath increases the strength of the sheath and lessens the risk of device separation.If resistance i anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of flexor sheath, consider carefully reinserting the dilator prior to continuing removal.¿ ¿precautions: in order to ensure device compatibility, choose a sheath size large enough to accommodate the maximum outer diameter of any devices that will be placed through the sheath.¿ ¿all interventional or diagnostic instruments used with this product should move freely through the valve and sheath to avoid damage.¿ ¿sheath removal: remove the sheath.Avoid applying traction to the hub during removal.If resistance is anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of the flexor sheath, consider reinserting the dilator and removing the sheath and dilator as a unit.¿ ¿how supplied: ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.From the information provided upon review of the customer testimony, dmr, dhr, ifu and investigation of the returned device, suggest that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.Based on the available information and results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause could not be established.There is currently a capa investigation open to investigate this product failure.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|