|
MERZ NORTH AMERICA, INC RADIESSE(+) INJECTABLE IMPLANT; IMPLANT, DERMAL, FOR AESTHETIC USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
8063M0K2 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Eye Injury (1845)
|
| Date of Event |
02/01/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This case was assessed as reportable to the fda, as the event posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (pt: optic ischaemic neuropathy), was deemed to meet the serious criteria of required intervention to prevent permanent damage.The device history record for radiesse(+) injectable implant, lot number a00086920, was reviewed.A lot search was conducted on the reported lot and no other similar events were noted.No nonconformance reports were noted related to this lot.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This mdr is related to mdrs 3013840437-2023-00012 and 3013840437-2023-00014, referring to the same patient.This spontaneous report was received from a us physician and concerns a patient.The patient was injected with a total of 0.4 ml of radiesse(+), into the central nasal dorsum (off label use of device), on (b)(6) 2023.Batch number was reported as a00086920 (expiry date: 11/2024).The batch record review was received and the lot number for radiesse(+) was confirmed as a00086920 (expiry date: 11/2024).A lot search in the global safety database was conducted.In (b)(6) 2023, after the radiesse(+) injection, the patient experienced visual field loss of the superior quadrants of the left eye, diagnosed by a retinal specialist as a posterior ischemic optic neuropathy.On (b)(6) 2023, the day prior to the report, the patient had magnetic resonance imaging (mri) that showed an acute ischemic stroke of the left frontal cortex.The physician was trying to figure out if this new finding was also related to a filler embolism.The outcome of the events was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Re-assessment due to the receipt of follow-up information on 21-feb-2023 was performed.Follow-up information was provided from the reporting physician that the event posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (pt: optic ischaemic neuropathy) (reported by the physician as vision loss) was confirmed to be secondary to the reported event filler embolism.Therefore, the event posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (pt: optic ischaemic neuropathy) was deleted as the event was assessed as being of consequence to the reported event filler embolism.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This mdr is related to mdrs 3013840437-2023-00012 and 3013840437-2023-00014, referring to the same patient.Follow-up information was received on 21-feb-2023: the events acute ischemic stroke of the left frontal cortex and posterior ischemic optic neuropathy were deleted, as the events were confirmed by the physician as secondary to the reported event filler embolism.The patients initials, age, date of birth and gender (female) were provided.She was 77 years old at the time of the event.Her weight was unknown.The patient was previously treated with fillers, multiple times.The patients medical history (and risk factors) included chronic severe migraines, arthritis, hearing loss and a malignant tumor of breast.Concomitant medications were reported as none.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient experienced the adverse events.The vision loss was confirmed by a retinal specialist, and the acute ischemic stroke was confirmed by an mri and a neurologist.Corrective treatment included hyaluronidase (600 units), nitropaste 2%, aspirin 325 mg, and ibuprofen 600 mg.The acute ischemic stroke was actually located in the right frontal cortex.The patient was evaluated by a neurologist, who felt the stroke was most likely secondary to a filler embolism.The neurologist reported that the stroke was completely asymptomatic, with no evident symptoms on a comprehensive neurologic exam.At the time of this report, she had persistent migraine symptoms and vision loss of the superior quadrants of the left eye.Due to the provided information, the outcome of the event filler embolism was considered as not resolved (changed from unknown).The retinal specialist suspected that the vision loss was going to be permanent, although there is a case report with similar circumstances, in which the patient recovered vision loss within 6 months of the embolic event.In the opinion of the reporter, the patient experienced an asymptomatic stroke from the filler embolism, treatment was necessary to prevent a permanent damage, the patients vision loss was permanent and related to the filler embolism.Her migraine was most likely due to her history of chronic, severe migraines.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|