• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO PGLA HLX; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO PGLA HLX; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number PV-12-30-HELIX
Medical Device Problem Codes Stretched (1601); Material Deformation (2976)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/31/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: product analysis of pv-12-30-helix, lot# b027905.Visual inspection/damage location details: the model or lot number for the unknown catheter were not provided; therefore, compatibility could not be assessed.The actuator interface was found to be broken but retained by release wire.The concerto coil pushwire was found to be kinked at load indicator, bent at ~ 14.9cm, and kinked at ~128.3cm from proximal end.The implant coil was found to be already detached and not returned.The shield coil was found to be stretched.All other subassemblies appeared to be normal, and no other anomalies were observed.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and the reported information, the customers report of ¿coil stretch¿ could not be confirmed as the implant was not returned.Possible causes for ¿coil stretch¿ are but not limited to, use of an incompatible device for delivery, tortuous patient anatomy, failure to hydrate the concerto coil prior to use, lack of continuous flush during delivery, or user advances the coil against resistance.Based on the device analysis and the reported information, the customers report of ¿pusher kink/damage¿ was confirmed.Possible cause for ¿pusher kink/damage¿ is user advances coil against resistance.However, the root cause could not be determined.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that during pre-operation, plush the coils.The coils were found elongated and stretched.There was friction or difficulty during testing or delivery.The continuous flush was administered during the procedure.The damage/stretched location on the device was the pushwire middle segment.The physician did not attempt to reposition the coil during the procedure.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received clarified that the pushwire was damaged at the start to middle segment, and also the coil body was stretched and elongated.There were no issues that resulted in the damage that was found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO PGLA HLX
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key16399388
Report Number2029214-2023-00306
Device Sequence Number17792774
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536033627
UDI-Public00847536033627
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
PMA/510(K) Number
K090046
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/20/2023
Device Model NumberPV-12-30-HELIX
Device Catalogue NumberPV-12-30-HELIX
Device Lot NumberB027905
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/10/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/15/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/03/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/17/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/20/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-