• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: Davol Inc., Sub. C.R. Bard, Inc. -1213643 Ventralight ST w/ Echo; Surgical Mesh

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

Davol Inc., Sub. C.R. Bard, Inc. -1213643 Ventralight ST w/ Echo; Surgical Mesh Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5955680
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 02/01/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol phasix st mesh (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2016 and phasix st on (b)(6) 2021.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2016 and phasix st on (b)(6) 2021.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 1).Per op notes, "the ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 1) was placed to the ventral area using tacks." (b)(6) 2022 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with the removal of old mesh (device 1) and implant of phasix st mesh (device 2).Per op notes, "the old mesh (device 1) was removed.A phasix st mesh (device 2) was placed to the anterior abdominal wall using sutures.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2016) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4, d.6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard phasix st mesh (device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
Ventralight ST w/ Echo
Common Device Name
Surgical Mesh
Manufacturer (Section D)
Davol Inc., Sub. C.R. Bard, Inc. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
Bard Shannon Limited 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
+1(401)825-8495
MDR Report Key16403713
Report Number1213643-2023-090709
Device Sequence Number3327742
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031755
UDI-Public(01)00801741031755(17)180528(10)HUAR2416
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K122436
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/11/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2018
Device Catalogue Number5955680
Device Lot NumberHUAR2416
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/15/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/06/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/20/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/11/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/15/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-