|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol phasix st mesh (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2016 and phasix st on (b)(6) 2021.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided:
(b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 1).Per op notes, "the ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 1) was placed to the ventral area using tacks."
(b)(6) 2022 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with the removal of old mesh (device 1) and implant of phasix st mesh (device 2).Per op notes, "the old mesh (device 1) was removed.A phasix st mesh (device 2) was placed to the anterior abdominal wall using sutures.".
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum:
this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2016) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4, d.6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard phasix st mesh (device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|