|
Patient weight, ethnicity and race: unknown.Date implanted: not applicable, as the iol was removed and replaced during the same procedure.Date explanted: not applicable, as the iol was removed and replaced during the same procedure, thus not explanted.The device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a visual analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and historical data analysis for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.Health effect - impact code: 4631 iol removal and replacement.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Corrected data: in review, it was noticed that the updated verbiage for the field "h3-other (81)" was inadvertently not used in the section "h10" of the initial mdr report; therefor, the information has been corrected in this supplemental mdr report and the following field was updated accordingly: h10: section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 27-feb-2023.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received wrapped in gauze.The complaint handpiece, folding carton, patient identification (id) card, implant notification card, patient stickers, and direction for use (dfu) were received as well.Visual inspection under magnification after lens cleaning revealed that the lens was received with a cut, edge chip, and edge tear.Plunger rod damage (bent) was observed consistent with excessive force during delivery.No additional defects or assembly issues were observed before and after disassembling the handpiece for evaluation.The complaint issue of ¿cosmetic issues¿ was not confirmed.The other observed issues found during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.The reported issue was not verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|