• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/31/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Weight and ethnicity: unknown.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.The device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the trailing haptic of the dib00 intraocular lens (iol) was broken upon insertion into patients right eye.Leading haptic was discovered to be broken as well during explantation.Additional information received stated that the trailing haptic of the iol was broken off, in addition to the leading haptic being severed at the haptic/optic junction which was noticed when the surgeon was rotating the iol in the capsular bag.The iol had to be cut out and removed during the case, and the surgeon implanted another dib00 with no issue.There was no use error.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 2/16/2023.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.No intraocular lens (iol) was received as part of this return.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint handpiece was received with the plunger rod fully advanced.The cartridge tip was bent, in a way consistent with a handpiece that was dropped.The handpiece was disassembled and the assembly was inspected, no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue could be identified.Conclusion: the complaint issues could not be confirmed due to no lens being returned.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key16433027
Report Number3012236936-2023-00435
Device Sequence Number7401128
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731660
UDI-Public(01)05050474731660(17)240412
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/12/2024
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0155
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/31/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/07/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/23/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/12/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-