|
Additional information was provided in sections d.9, h.3, h.6 and h.10.A review of the device history record (dhr) traceable to the reported lot number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.The sample is received with inner blister and without outer blister or cover foil.The sample shows no macroscopic signs of damage.The sample shows signs of surgery residues and is returned in a opened status.The sample was visually inspected with the aid of a photomicroscope with various magnifications.The sample was visually tested and functionally tested.It was noticed that the loop does not extend far enough.As the blister was opened by the customer, he handled the product.The point in time when the malfunction occurred, can no longer be determent.The customer¿s complaint is confirmed.It cannot be determined how or where the damage to the sample occurred; therefore, a root cause for the customers reported event could not be determined.However, the damage was consistent with damage that can occur due to improper handling.The exact root cause for the customer¿s reported event is unknown, therefore, specific action cannot be taken.Complaints are reviewed and monitored at regular intervals for adverse trends.No adverse trends have been observed associated with the reported product and event.No action has been identified for this reported event.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|