• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number D-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Problems Difficult to Advance (2920); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 02/23/2023
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device was not returned, therefore no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic has requested additional information pertaining to this reportable event.If additional reportable information is received, a supplemental report will be submitted.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the attempted implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, while attempting to cross the aortic arch, the physician encountered resistance.Instead of pushing aggressively, the physician pulled back and retried.Subsequently, the patient coded. it was noted that the patient had a calcified aorta. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed.Due to the calcification and frailty of the patient's tissue, it was believed that the cause of death may have occurred due to an aortic dissection.During cpr, the ventricle was checked and remained unchanged from pre-procedure.The cause of death was not confirmed.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: a1: patient identifier, b5: event description, d4: expiration date, lot# and udi#; h4: device manufacture date.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that the probable cause of death was aortic dissection but could not be confirmed.Per the physician, the delivery catheter system (dcs) did not cause or contribute to the death.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated b5.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received which reported that the delivery catheter system (dcs) probably caused the dissection due to extremely thin tissue, however was not confirmed.The cause of the dissection could have been anything else passing over the aortic arch.No excessive force was used when attempting to cross the arch.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: a medical safety assessment was completed.Based on the information provided, it was determined that the aortic arch dissection, and subsequent death, is likely related to the evolut fx delivery catheter system (dcs).A heavily calcified and frail aortic arch were likely contributing factors to the aortic dissection that was difficult for the dcs to pass over, however, the aortic dissection was not confirmed.Difficulties advancing the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique, including guidewire and introducer sheath selection.In this case, it was noted that the patient had a calcified aorta.This indicates that the probable cause of the advancement difficulties was patient anatomy, but this cannot be confirmed with the limited information available.Advancement difficulties do not typically indicate a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.Vascular complications, such as dissection, are a known potential adverse patient effect per the device instructions for use (ifu), and are typically related to patient factors (anatomy, comorbidities, etc.), and/or procedural effects (sheath used, user technique, puncture cut location, etc.).In this case, it was reported that the dcs probably caused the dissection due to extremely thin tissue, however, this could not be confirmed.It was also reported that the cause of the dissection could have been anything else passing over the aortic arch.There was no information to suggest that a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications was related to these events.Due to the calcification and frailty of the patient's tissue, it was believed that the probable cause of death was aortic dissection but could not be confirmed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT FX DCS
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16456372
MDR Text Key310403894
Report Number2025587-2023-00726
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00763000365677
UDI-Public00763000365677
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberD-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Catalogue NumberD-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Lot Number0011497651
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2023
Date Device Manufactured11/10/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention;
Patient Age91 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight40 KG
-
-