| Catalog Number |
02-022-44-4009 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unstable (1667); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Osteolysis (2377); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Joint Laxity (4526); Swelling/ Edema (4577); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
09/06/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, cemented, polymer/metal/polymer.Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported via a legal notification that a patient, initial bilateral knees implanted on (b)(6) 2016, underwent a revision procedure on his left knee on (b)(6) 2019, in which he was implanted with a recalled truliant psc tibial insert.On (b)(6) 2022, the plaintiff underwent a second revision surgery on his left knee for issues including but not limited to polyethylene wear, bone loss, osteolysis, instability, and/or component loosening.The plaintiff¿s revision surgeries were due to accelerated and preventable wear of the optetrak and truliant polyethylene tibial inserts.The plaintiff experiences daily pain and discomfort in his left knee which limits his activities of daily living and impacts his quality of life.As a direct, proximate, and legal consequence of the defective nature of the device as described herein, the plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer permanent and debilitating injuries and damages, including but not limited to, significant pain and discomfort; gait impairment; poor balance; difficulty walking; component part loosening; soft tissue damage; bone loss; and other injuries presently undiagnosed, which all require ongoing medical care.No device returns anticipated due to this being a legal case.No further information.First revision reported under (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product information has been identified.As a result, the following fields have been updated: d1, d4, g4, h4, h7, and h9.Added information to e3 and e4.Further information and/or investigation results will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: investigation results - the revision reported was likely the result of prosthesis wear and patient-related conditions.The extent and root cause of the prosthesis wear could not be determined as the device was not returned for evaluation, and images and radiographs were not provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a left knee revision.Subsequently, the patient experienced loosening, prosthesis wear and instability.As a result, the patient underwent an additional left knee revision approximately 2 years and 10 months after previous revision.No further patient impact reported.No further information available.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|