|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: the complaint device is not being returned, it was discarded, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation, however a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, it could be observed that the anchor is in used condition, it is not seated in its corresponding place.Residues of biological matter could be seen on the suture, the anchor and the handle.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 9l45425 number, and no non-conformances were identified. as part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications. according with the visual inspection result, this complaint can be confirmed.A possible root cause can be attributed to a procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure.However, it cannot be conclusively determined.As per ifu: bone stock must be adequate to allow proper and secure anchor placement.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|