• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LDR MÉDICAL ROI-C ANCHORING PLATE; ROI-C TITANIUM-COATED IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LDR MÉDICAL ROI-C ANCHORING PLATE; ROI-C TITANIUM-COATED IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number MC1005T
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/02/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an roi-c superior plate at c5/6 was found to have fractured six months post-operatively via x-rays.The patient was inactive and the cage did not show signs of sinking (movement) post-operatively.The awl was used prior to installing the plates when they were installed in the patient.There are no health impacts and no plans for a revision surgery.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional method code: (b)(4).Corrections in d4: udi number.Additional information in d4 expiration date, h4, and h6: component, investigation type, findings, and conclusions.Device evaluation: the device remains implanted, so it was not returned and an evaluation is unable to be performed.X-rays were provided, which show that one of the anchoring plates is fractured.Root cause: a definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.This event could possibly be attributed to unknown patient or surgical factors.Dhr review: per dhr review, the part was likely conforming when it left zimvie control.Device usage: this device is used for treatment.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report, a follow-up report will be sent.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an roi-c superior plate at c5/6 was found to have fractured six months post-operatively via x-rays.The patient was inactive and the cage did not show signs of sinking (movement) post-operatively.The awl was used prior to installing the plates when they were installed in the patient.There are no health impacts and no plans for a revision surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROI-C ANCHORING PLATE
Common Device Name
ROI-C TITANIUM-COATED IMPLANT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
LDR MÉDICAL
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine, na 10300
FR  10300
Manufacturer (Section G)
LDR MÉDICAL
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine, na 10300
FR   10300
Manufacturer Contact
kim martinez
10225 westmoor dr.
na
westminster, CO 80021
3035144809
MDR Report Key16480984
Report Number3004788213-2023-00019
Device Sequence Number19632914
Product Code OVE
UDI-Device Identifier03662663016971
UDI-Public(01)03662663016971(17)270201(10)866439
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K151934
Exemption Number5645646
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Catalogue NumberMC1005T
Device Lot Number866439
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/06/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/03/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/31/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexPrefer Not To Disclose
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-