| Model Number |
DCB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Crack (1135)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/01/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Implant date: if implanted, give date: unknown/not reported; it is unknown if the iol had any patient contact or if it was implanted.Explant date: if explanted, give date: unknown/not reported; it is unknown if the iol had any patient contact or if it was implanted.Initial reporter telephone number: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) cartridge tears at the end while inserting the lens into the patient's operative eye.This occurs as the surgeon screws the lens through into the eye.The implant also has some small little defects on it.The surgeon sees abnormalities on the lens.Nurse assured she filled the cartridge with bss and sat for more than 3-5 minutes.No other information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: upon further review, it was noted that in the initial mdr section g2 was inadvertently not included; therefore, it is captured in this supplemental report.In section b5 in the initial mdr, bss was abbreviated and should have included balanced salt solution (bss).Additionally, added a statement about follow up and all pertinent information has been submitted in section h10.The following sections have been updated accordingly: section g2: report source: foreign, company representative.Section h10: additional narratives/data: an attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.Section h10: additional narratives/data: all pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional info: device evaluation: a customer provided photo was received as part of this complaint.Visual inspection of the customer provided photo revealed a stress mark on the cartridge leading to the cartridge tip.The stress mark identified was observed to be within specification because no lens was stuck inside the cartridge and no cartridge or cartridge tip crack was identified.The cartridge tip was also slightly deformed.No photo of the complaint lens was received; therefore, the complaint issue of lens damage could not be confirmed.No further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue " cartridge tip cracked/damaged was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.The other observed issue found during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: in reviewing the initial mdr, it was noticed that the following information was inadvertently not included in section h10; therefore, it is captured in this supplemental report: section a2, a4, a5: unknown/asked but unavailable (asku) due to personal data privacy policy.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|