|
Patient''s date of birth unk.Other relevant history unk.The device was discarded, thus no investigation could be completed.Perforation of vessels is a known risk of complication with use of the tightrail device.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to an alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|
|
A lead extraction procedure commenced to remove a fractured right ventricular (rv) lead, implanted in 2010.Right atrial (ra) and left ventricular (lv) leads were present in the patient as well, but were not initially targeted for extraction.A spectranetics lead locking device (lld) was inserted into the rv lead to provide traction.A spectranetics 16f glidelight laser sheath was used to begin the procedure, advancing in the subclavian vein to the area of the clavicle, encountering significant binding between the lead''s proximal coil and the clavicle.After lasing multiple times, the physician chose a spectranetics 11f tightrail rotating dilator sheath, and was able to advance through the binding site down to the superior vena cava (svc)/ra junction.Progress stalled so the physician removed the tightrail from the patient and the tightrail''s outer sheath was added, advancing these devices back into the patient.Binding was again encountered in the subclavian region, but finally the outer sheath was able to advance, along with the tightrail.The devices reached the area of the tricuspid valve (tv) and the rv lead eventually released.It was not until the devices were removed from the heart that the patient''s blood pressure was noted to be low.Rescue efforts began, including cardiac backup.Due to a large amount of blood coming from the pocket/subclavian region, it was determined that a perforation of the subclavian vein had occurred; the physician felt the outer sheath, combined with the precarious position of the rv lead, caused the perforation.Transesophageal echocardiography (tee) and fluoroscopy were used to ensure an svc perforation had not occurred.The bleeding in the subclavian vein was controlled with use of an 8 mm balloon, and the patient stabilized.A covered stent was chosen to repair the perforation.In order to not ''jail'' the ra and lv leads under the stent, the balloon was deflated, llds were inserted into the ra and lv leads, and were successfully removed.The balloon was re-inflated and hemostasis was achieved.The covered stent was deployed, achieving successful repair of the perforation.The patient survived the procedure, and a new system will be re-implanted at a later time.This event captures the tightrail outer sheath in use when the perforation occurred, requiring intervention.There was no alleged malfunction of any spectranetics devices in use during the procedure.
|