|
An outside of the united states (ous) customer contacted a siemens customer care center (ccc) to report falsely depressed urinary/cerebrospinal fluid protein (ucfp) urine sample results using lot 120243 on an atellica ch analyzer that did not match with the profile of the other tests performed on this patient.Quality controls (qc) were in range at the time of the event.The interpretation of results section of the instructions for use (ifu) states: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." the limitations section of the ifu states: "as with any chemical reaction, you must be alert to the possible effect of unknown interferences from medications or endogenous substances.The laboratory and physician must evaluate all patient results in light of the total clinical status of the patient." siemens is investigating.
|
|
The initial mdr 1219913-2023-00048 was filed on march 10, 2023.An outside of the united states (ous) customer contacted a siemens customer care center (ccc) to report falsely depressed urinary/cerebrospinal fluid protein (ucfp) urine sample results using lot 120243 on an atellica ch analyzer that did not match with the profile of the other tests performed on this patient.Additional information - march 21, 2023: siemens requested additional information regarding true results, patient diagnosis and medications and this information was not able to be provided.In addition, another sample was drawn, but ucfp was not run on this sample.The lower end of the analytical measuring range for ucfp is 60 mg/l and the xualb is running less than 60 with values of 50, 54 and 50 mg/l.This does not indicate that the total protein concentration cannot still be less than 60 mg/l.Depending on the patient diagnosis, albumin can makeup a large portion of the urine protein.The initial issue was reported as low urine protein.Siemens cannot definitively determine the cause of this discrepant result, or if the result is indeed discordant at all since requested information was not availabe.Contributing factors such as sample integrity, sample specific interferent and preanalytical variables cannot be ruled out.Quality control was in range and no issues were noted with other patient samples indicating that the instrument and reagents were performing acceptably.Repeat of the same sample was not performed and the sample is unavailable.Based on the results of the investigation, return of the patient sample is not warranted.A potential product issue has not been identified.In section h6, the investigation finding, and investigation conclusion codes were updated.
|