| Model Number |
DFW225 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Halo (2227)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Ethnicity: unknown/ asked but not provided.Date of event: the exact date is unknown, not provided, but the best estimate/approximate date is (b)(6) 2022.The device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, the information has not been provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's left eye as the patient could not tolerate, get used to halos in both eyes.The issue did not significantly affect patient¿s daily activities.Another johnson & johnson lens of diu model was used as a replacement (the diopter was not provided).No further medical or surgical intervention was required and no delay in procedure reported.The patient outcome is unknown.No further information was provided.Patient had bilateral lens implants.This report captures the lens implanted in patient's left eye.A separate report will be filed for the right eye.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: the following fields were updated based on the new information received: section a2: age: 62 years.Section a5: ethnicity: not hispanic/ not latino.Section b5: additional information received about the patient's left eye lens was that the replacement lens was a diu150 of the same diopter (23.0 d).It was confirmed that no vitrectomy, no incision enlargement and no sutures required.The patient's outcome indicated as 20/25 without glasses and no injury was reported.No further information was provided.Section b7: other relevant history, including preexisting medical conditions: crohn's disease.Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: mar 16, 2023.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: two lenses were received for product investigations (pi) for patient's right and left eyes; because both lenses are the same model it is difficult to determine visually which lens correspond to which pi.Therefore, both lenses were evaluated in this evaluation.Visual inspection of the sample #1: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and, no issues were identified.Visual inspection of the sample #2: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and, two scratches on the optic body could be identified.Conclusion: the complaint issues were not confirmed for either lens.The other observed issue found during the product evaluations could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|