• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU225
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 12/09/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) did not give enough near vision without glasses despite target -1-25.Problem occurred at all times post-implant.Visual acuity (va) pre-operative (op): 20/20 glare to 20/40, post-op va: 20/20.The patient needed lens exchange to a multifocal lens.There was incision enlargement, but no vitrectomy, no sutures.Standard post-op meds were given.Reportedly, the patient had cataract surgery on the right eye (od).The doctor did the surgery with an eyhance toric.At patient's 1 week appointment, it is noted ¿patient not happy with her vision.She says her vision is very blurry distance and near od.Os (left eye) is still blurry.Patient wants to wait until od is better before proceeding with os surgery.¿ patient has had numerous visits and has not been happy with her vision.The patient came back and saw the doctor and they discussed doing an iol exchange.Explant was replaced with a non-johnson and johnson iol.The product is not available for return.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(ethnicity): unknown/ not provided.Asku.Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site as it was discarded; therefore, product testing could not be performed and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured according to specifications.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search of complaints revealed that no similar complaint for this production order number has been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key16530288
Report Number3012236936-2023-00533
Device Sequence Number2621589
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474747173
UDI-Public(01)05050474747173(17)240123
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/23/2024
Device Model NumberDIU225
Device Catalogue NumberDIU225U220
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/20/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/23/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight85 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-