• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 740 VR-T PROMRI; ICD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 740 VR-T PROMRI; ICD Back to Search Results
Model Number 381459
Device Problem Premature End-of-Life Indicator (1480)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that this device was explanted due to eos status approx.113 months after the implantation.No adverse patient events were reported.Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this icd were reviewed.All production steps were performed accordingly, and in particular the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.The icd interrogation revealed the eos battery status, detected on (b)(6) 2023.The device was implanted for 113 months.An amount of 40 charging cycles were documented.The icd was subjected to an electrical analysis.First, the eos status was removed with a technical programmer and the ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device detected the fibrillation signal as specified and started the charging of a defibrillation shock.The shock was delivered, but the specified energy level was not reached.The current consumption of the icd was analyzed and found to be normal and as expected.However, the amount of charge taken from the battery was verified and the battery condition was not as expected.Therefore, the icd was opened and the inner assembly was inspected.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies.In a next step, the electronic module was attached to an external power supply to check the functionality of the electronic module.The measured current consumption was normal and as expected.Analysis of the electronic module revealed no indication of a malfunction.The battery was sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.The manufacturing records of the battery were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the battery manufacturing.No anomalies were documented during the production process associated with this battery.The visual inspection of the battery did not reveal any external signs of damage.In a next step, the battery was opened for destructive analysis.During the analysis of the inner assembly an elevated internal battery impedance was identified.It is reasonable to assume that the increased impedance has led to a voltage drop and therefore to the clinical consequence.In conclusion, the device was implanted for 113 months.Further investigations revealed an elevated battery impedance as the root cause of the clinical observation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 740 VR-T PROMRI
Type of Device
ICD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key16533993
MDR Text Key311237892
Report Number1028232-2023-01254
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2014
Device Model Number381459
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/04/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-