| Model Number |
M006175263010 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/20/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a percuflex plus ureteral stent was used during a urology stenting procedure in the ureter performed on (b)(6) 2023.During preparation, it was noted that the stent became broken when the suture was removed.It was reported that the stent shaft was broken into two pieces.The procedure was successfully completed with another percuflex plus ureteral stent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Imdrf device code a0401 captures the reportable event of stent shaft broken.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a percuflex plus ureteral stent was used during a urology stenting procedure in the ureter performed on (b)(6) 2023.During preparation, it was noted that the stent became broken when the suture was removed.It was reported that the stent shaft was broken into two pieces.The procedure was successfully completed with another percuflex plus ureteral stent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6: imdrf device code a0401 captures the reportable event of stent shaft broken.Correction to device and component code: additional information received that the stent coil was detached.Block h10: the returned percuflex plus ureteral stent was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the bladder coil was detached.The suture, positioner and the detached part was not returned, however their respective axxcess catheter and guidewire inside their original pouches were in good condition.A functional test was performed and used a mandrel of 0.039" and the stent pass through without resistance.During magnification, it was observed closely that the section of the device was detached.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event was confirmed.Based on the most relevant information of the complaint event description, device analysis and including the product record review results, the device meets all manufacturing specifications required and passed all the controls and inspections, no abnormalities were reported during the assembly process.According to the evidence, it is possible that operational factors, interaction of the excess force during interaction with the suture string such as an entanglement before their use could have caused the detachment that was observed.Consequently, affect the performance of the device.Therefore, all compiled information on this investigation determines that the most probable cause is adverse event related to procedure since the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|