|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Initial reporter occupation: lawyer.Component code: appropriate term/code not available (g07002) used to capture no findings available.Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Litigation complaint received ad 24 feb 2023.Patient received a right primary attune knee.The patella was resurfaced, and unknown cement was utilized.Male patient received a right knee revision to treat a failed tka.Upon entering the joint, the surgeon identified and debrided synovitis and foreign body reaction.The tibial tray was grossly loose and debonded at the cement to implant interface and had migrated into varus.The surgeon notes tibial bone loss after the tray was removed.The femoral component was well-fixed but revised to accommodate the revision knee construct.The patella was well-fixed and retained.There was no reported product problem with the revised tibial insert.The patient received a tc3 revision knee.The procedure was completed without complications.Doi: (b)(6) 2017.Dor: (b)(6) 2022, right knee.
|