|
H.6 investigation summary scope of issue: the scope of issue is only limited to facscalibur, part # 342975 and serial # (b)(6).Problem statement: customer reported a complaint regarding unexpected results on (b)(6) 2023.This poses the risk of producing erroneous results that might impact patient diagnosis and treatment.The instrument was repaired and found to be functioning as expected, and neither the customer nor any patients were harmed due to this issue.¿ manufacturing defect trend: there are zero qns (quality notifications) for part # 342975 related to the reported issue.Date range from (b)(6) 2022 to (b)(6) 2023.¿ device history record (dhr) review: dhr part # 342975, serial # (b)(6), file # (b)(4), was reviewed.The instrument met all the manufacturing specifications prior to release.¿ complaint history review: there are 7 complaints for part # 342975 related to the as reported code 1 ¿ result - erroneous diagnostic; date range from (b)(6) 2022 to (b)(6) 2023.¿ returned sample analysis: a return sample was not requested for evaluation because the potential cause of the issue was determined using the servicemax review.After the repairs/replacements, the instrument was found to be performing as intended.¿ service history review: review of related work order #: (b)(4); case # (b)(4) install date: (b)(6) 2014 defective part number: 03-20128-02 - pcb assembly ssc/fl2 or fl1/fl3 work order notes: o subject / reported: pi-342975 - facscalibur - abnormal result o problem description: facscalibur - result was abnormal ;clinical, not used in patient diagnosis, did not affect the patient.Ren lei o work performed : fl2-1 compensation adjustment can not be adjusted, after replacing the fl1/3 circuit board to solve, the preparation of samples on the machine results are normal, the instrument operation is normal o cause: fl2-1 compensation adjustment can not be adjusted, after replacing the fl1/3 circuit board to solve, the preparation of samples on the machine results are normal, the instrument operation is normal o solution: fl2-1 compensation adjustment can not be adjusted, after replacing the fl1/3 circuit board to solve, the preparation of samples on the machine results are normal, the instrument operation is normal o parts replaced: 03-20128-02 - pcb assembly ssc/fl2 or fl1/fl3 ¿ labeling / packaging review: n/a ¿ risk analysis: risk management file part # 342973ra, rev.04/vers.D, risk analysis facscalibur prod family was reviewed.This file did not contain the appropriate hazards and mitigations, and an eco has been opened to assess additional hazards and their risk levels.Ecr #(b)(4) has been created and will revise the existing calibur risk analysis document to include causes, mitigations, and risk ratings related to erroneous results.¿ potential causes: based on the investigation results, the potential cause of the abnormal result was a failed fl1/3 circuit board.¿ investigation result / analysis: the investigation was performed and based on the review of complaint trend, defect trend, dhr review, risk analysis, and service activity review, the potential cause of the abnormal result was a failed fl1/3 circuit board.The customer reported a complaint regarding abnormal results.The fl2-1 compensation could not be adjusted.In an attempt to resolve the issue, the field service representative (fsr) replaced the fl1/3 circuit board.After the replacement, the issue was resolved.The instrument is confirmed to be performing as intended.Although the unexpected results were from patient samples, no patient was treated nor harmed from incorrect results.The results were captured prior to any diagnostic decision and was not reported to the clinician.¿ conclusion: based on the investigation results, the complaint was confirmed, and the potential cause of the abnormal results was a failed fl1/3 circuit board.The customer reported a complaint regarding abnormal results.In an attempt to resolve the issue, the fsr replaced the fl1/3 circuit board.After the replacement, the instrument was operating as intended.Based on the investigation results a capa is not required because the issue was resolved and there was no impact to customer and patient health or safety.¿ supporting document: n/a h3 other text : see h.10.
|