• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 48MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 48MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Model Number 74123148
Medical Device Problem Code Biocompatibility (2886)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Date of Event 12/11/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a left bhr resurfacing construct had been implanted on (b)(6) 2009, the patient sustained left hip pain and elevated cobalt and chrome levels in blood (unspecified concentration).A revision surgery was conducted on (b)(6) 2018 to treat this adverse event.During this procedure, the acetabular cup and resurfacing head were explanted and replaced with a thr system.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a left hip revision surgery was performed due to left hip pain and elevated cobalt and chrome levels in blood (unspecified concentration).As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the devices concerned was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the head and the cup, and this failure will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported pain, rising cobalt, chromium levels, and slightly grey fluid cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal performance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond the reported events cannot be determined.However, it is noted the patient had a 2nd revision 14-months later.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.G4: date received by manufacturer d10: concomitant device added emdr section h6.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that a left hip revision surgery was performed due to left hip pain and elevated cobalt and chrome levels in blood (unspecified concentration).As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the devices concerned was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the head and the cup, and this failure will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported pain, rising cobalt, chromium levels, and slightly grey fluid cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal performance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond the reported events cannot be determined.However, it is noted the patient had a 2nd revision 14-months later.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 48MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key16542397
Report Number3005975929-2023-00018
Device Sequence Number15018977
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010552426
UDI-Public03596010552426
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P040033
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2018
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/30/2013
Device Model Number74123148
Device Catalogue Number74123148
Device Lot Number08HW18650
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/15/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/05/2023
05/13/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/14/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/24/2023
05/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2008
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
ACTBLR CP SZ48/56 (PN:74122156, LN:07HW13243)
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-