• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CLINICAL INNOVATIONS KIWI VACUUM ASSISTED DELIVERY SYSTEM; VACUUM ASSISTED DELIVERY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CLINICAL INNOVATIONS KIWI VACUUM ASSISTED DELIVERY SYSTEM; VACUUM ASSISTED DELIVERY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number VAC-6000MT
Medical Device Problem Codes Use of Device Problem (1670); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 02/13/2023
Type of Reportable Event Death
Event or Problem Description
In the customer's words: "operative vaginal delivery via kiwi vacuum.Infant with subgaleal bleed".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Note: several follow up attempts have been made with the hospital but clinical innovations has not been able to get in contact with the initial reporter.Product evaluation: the complaint is not confirmed.No product evaluation could be performed because the device was not returned and no photos were provided by the customer.Investigation description: a dhr review could not be performed because the lot number is unknown risk assessment: per fmea risk-0029 rev.02, the complaint may be associated with the following potential failure mode: note: potential failure modes 1 - 6 share the same the same potential causes and are grouped together in the list below.Potential failure mode 7 is listed separately.Potential failure mode 1: user fails to follow recommendations of abandonment; 1) if no descent (progress) of the head occurs after 2 tractions.2) if delivery is not achieved or imminent after 4 tractions, or 3) if the vacuum cup detaches ("pops-off") twice.Potential effects: excessive attempts lead to fetal or maternal injury.Potential failure mode 2: user fails to locate the flexion point and locates the device on a different area potential effects: using the device on a different location other than flexion point cause inappropriate use of the device.Potential failure mode 3: user locates the flexion point but fails to note distance where finger meets introitus (fails to calculate the distance).Potential effects: user inserts the device on a different location causing inappropriate use of device.Potential failure mode 4: user fails to push cup posteriorly along maternal midline over flexion point.Potential effects: user inserts the device on a different location causing inappropriate use of device.Potential failure mode 5: user fails to establish appropriate level (450 - 600 mmhg) of vacuum.Potential effects: the device disengages/pops off the fetal head.Potential failure mode 6: user creates vacuum but fails to exclude any maternal tissue.Potential cause: failure to exclude any maternal tissue causes cup detachment/pop-off.Harm 1: hematoma.Severity: 4.Potential cause: lack of attention, not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "monitor".Harm 2: abrasion.Severity: 2.Potential cause: lack of attention, not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "acceptable".Harm 3: fracture.Severity: 3.Potential cause: lack of attention, not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "acceptable".Harm 4: laceration.Severity: 3.Potential cause: lack of attention, not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "acceptable".Harm 5: death.Severity: potential cause: lack of attention, not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "monitor".Potential failure mode 7: user fails to initiate traction along axis of pelvis.Potential effects: excessive force is used.Harm 1: hematoma.Severity: 4 potential cause: user moves handle up and down while pulling; user moves handle side to side while pulling; not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "monitor".Harm 2: abrasion.Severity: 2.Potential cause: user moves handle up and down while pulling; user moves handle side to side while pulling; not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "acceptable".Harm 3: fracture.Severity: 3.Potential cause: user moves handle up and down while pulling; user moves handle side to side while pulling; not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "acceptable".Harm 4: laceration.Severity: 3.Potential cause: user moves handle up and down while pulling; user moves handle side to side while pulling; not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "acceptable".Harm 5: death.Severity: potential cause: user moves handle up and down while pulling; user moves handle side to side while pulling; not qualified personnel.Probability of occurrence: 1.Risk is considered "monitor".Root cause analysis: a root cause cannot be determined because the device was not returned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
KIWI VACUUM ASSISTED DELIVERY SYSTEM
Common Device Name
VACUUM ASSISTED DELIVERY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CLINICAL INNOVATIONS
747 w 4170 s
murray UT 84123
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLINICAL INNOVATIONS, LLC
747 w 4170 s
murray UT 84123
Manufacturer Contact
zulmar molina
747 w 4170 s
murray, UT 84123
MDR Report Key16546287
Report Number1722684-2023-00003
Device Sequence Number17644276
Product Code HDB
UDI-Device Identifier00814247020642
UDI-Public00814247020642
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K981260
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberVAC-6000MT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Death;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-