|
|
| Model Number |
PDP340H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Wound Dehiscence (1154)
|
| Date of Event |
03/01/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a cesarean section on (b)(6) 2023 and suture was used on the fascia of the abdominal wall.Post-op, on (b)(6) 2023, the wound of the abdomen was dehiscent and the intestine protruded, therefore re-operation was performed.During the re-operation, it was found that the suture had been ruptured, and interrupted suture was performed.The re-operation took 50 minutes.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient was doing well.The current status of the patient was reported as in the hospital and doing well.The surgeon commented that because the suture collected from the wound dehiscence was ruptured, there is some relationship between the product and the event.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 3/16/2023.This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.¿ trade name - irgacare®.¿ active ingredient(s) ¿ triclosan.¿ dosage form ¿ suture/solid/parenteral.¿ strength ¿ 2360 g/m.Adverse event problem component code: g07002 device not returned.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.What tissue dehisced? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? how was the suture originally tied (multiple knots, square knot, etc.)? what instruments were used in this procedure to handle the suture? was there any precipitating stress factor for the suture breakage? please describe the appearance of the suture during the second procedure.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? lot number? if applicable, will product be returned? if so, please provide the return date and tracking information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: fascia closure: fascia was closed with pdp340h by continuous suturing.[reoperation] fascia closure: fascia was closed with pdp340h by interrupted suturing.What tissue dehisced? fascia what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? not reported any abnormality with the patient how was the suture originally tied (multiple knots, square knot, etc.)? continuous what instruments were used in this procedure to handle the suture? unknown was there any precipitating stress factor for the suture breakage? not reported.Please describe the appearance of the suture during the second procedure.Because the suture collected from the wound dehiscence was ruptured, the surgeon thinks there is some relationship between the product and the event.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? not reported.Other relevant patient history/concomitant medications?unknown what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? because the suture collected from the wound dehiscence was ruptured, the surgeon thinks there is some relationship between the product and the event.What is the patient's current status? good.Lot number? unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional h6 component code: g07002 reported condition not confirmed.Additional h3 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection was conducted on the returned device.The returned sample determined that it was received two suture pieces that pertain to the product code pdp340h.During the visual inspection of two suture pieces, body fluids, and a knot were noted in each piece of suture.Also, the ends were cut appear to be by use of surgical instrument; and this is consistently with the removed of the suture from the patient.As per the condition of the returned sample, no additional test could be performed.The manufacturing records could not be reviewed as the batch number is unknown.No conclusion could be reached as to what caused the reported complaint.As part of ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|