• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORNIER INC LATITUDE EV HUMERAL STEM COATED LARGE LEFT 150 MM; PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORNIER INC LATITUDE EV HUMERAL STEM COATED LARGE LEFT 150 MM; PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 0030513
Medical Device Problem Codes Osseointegration Problem (3003); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Implant Pain (4561)
Date of Event 10/01/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient had post-operative complication of component loosening."since (b)(6), probably after musculation efforts, intense pain in the left elbow.X-rays show a loosening of the humeral implant (stem) and lateral deviation of the radial implant.The patient experienced pain on his prosthesis when practicing weightlifting and during a move.He did not really follow the precautionary instructions and avoidance of carrying loads.The patient underwent a revision to remove the radial implant and change the humeral implant.The ao classification does not apply to bone loss of the humerus, ulna and radius (after 7 interventions following an open fracture in 2013 by motorcycle accident).This is well beyond c3.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient had post-operative complication of component loosening."since october 22, probably after musculation efforts, intense pain in the left elbow.X-rays show a loosening of the humeral implant (stem) and lateral deviation of the radial implant.The patient experienced pain on his prosthesis when practicing weightlifting, and during a move.He did not really follow the precautionary instructions and avoidance of carrying loads.The patient underwent a revision to remove the radial implant and change the humeral implant.The ao classification does not apply to bone loss of the humerus, ulna and radius (after 7 interventions following an open fracture in 2013 by motorcycle accident).This is well beyond c3.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed since the device was not returned for evaluation.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available to determine the root cause of the complaint event.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were found during the investigation.The medical opinion of a medical expert was requested to evaluate the risk of this event: « i carefully reviewed the documents and the x-rays that were sent to me.The patient had a complex fracture of the elbow in 2014 and underwent 7 surgeries before implantation of the total elbow arthroplasty (tea, including rh implant) in 2022.In the pre-operative situation, the patient practically had a ¿floating elbow¿ because of the bone loss including the distal humeral epicondyles and soft tissue damage.The risk of a pre-existing surgical site infection was communicated with the patient.In fact, intra-operative cultures taken during tea implantation showed staphylococcus aureus, for which the patient was treated with antibiotics for 2 months postoperatively.The x-rays confirm the alleged adverse event of tea implant loosening and radial head dislocation.The adverse event most likely is attributable to multiple factors including insufficient bone quality, lack of good soft tissue and muscular support for elbow stability, probability of persistent infection (as per distal humerus periosteal reaction on the x-ray) and overloading of the elbow because of weight-lifting activities by the patient.The confirmation/exclusion of persistent infection can be made during the revision surgery for sure.» if the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LATITUDE EV HUMERAL STEM COATED LARGE LEFT 150 MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORNIER INC
10801 nesbitt avenue s
bloomington MN 55437
Manufacturer (Section G)
TORNIER INC
10801 nesbitt avenue s
bloomington MN 55437
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key16567959
Report Number0001649390-2023-00035
Device Sequence Number17526780
Product Code JDB
UDI-Device Identifier00846832002887
UDI-Public00846832002887
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
PMA/510(K) Number
K171010
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/23/2023
Device Model Number0030513
Device Catalogue Number0030513
Device Lot NumberCC0220182
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/20/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/23/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/17/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/23/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight100 KG
-
-