|
It was reported that, after a total right hip arthroplasty using a bhr system with corail stem on (b)(6) 2010 due to arthrosis, the plaintiff started to experience pain in the operated hip.This event was solved via revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022, in which necrotic tissue and dark fluid indicative of an adverse local tissue reaction secondary to metal wear and/or corrosion was noted.All the components of the primary surgery were explanted and replaced with a competitor's system.After the procedure, the patient was awakened from anesthesia and taken to the post anesthesia care unit (pacu) in stable condition.
|
|
It was reported that a right hip revision surgery was performed due to pain, necrotic tissue, dark fluid indicative of an adverse local tissue reaction secondary and metal wear and/or corrosion.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the devices concerned was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup and the head.This will continue to be monitored via routine trending, however it should be noted that this device is no longer sold.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.The clinical information provided, of necrotic tissue, dark fluid, corrosion products around the trunnion and large osteolytic defect may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.However, the source and the root cause cannot be determined with the available documentation.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical findings are associated with the implant failure.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|