• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. BENCHMARK BMX 96 ACCESS SYSTEM; DQY, QJP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. BENCHMARK BMX 96 ACCESS SYSTEM; DQY, QJP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BMX9690BER125
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/21/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a benchmark bmx96 access system (bmx96), penumbra system red 62 reperfusion catheter (red62), velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity), and an 8f non-penumbra sheath.It was noted that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous and calcified.During the procedure, the physician accessed the right groin using the bmx96 and had difficulty advancing the bmx96.It was reported that the physician was torquing the bmx96 with resistance while advancing.Subsequently, the physician broke the bmx96 in half into two separate pieces.The hospital technologist held pressure on the right groin and the physician accessed the left groin using an 8f sheath and a new bmx96.The procedure was completed using a new bmx96, red62, velocity, and sheath.The patient was then taken into or and the broken bmx96 was removed via open surgery.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following sections were incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and are being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report: 3005168196-2023-00123 1.Section b.Box 1.Adverse event and/or product problem 2.Section b.Box 2.Outcomes attributed to adverse event 3.Section h.Box 1.Type of reportable event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BENCHMARK BMX 96 ACCESS SYSTEM
Common Device Name
DQY, QJP
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key16588459
Report Number3005168196-2023-00123
Device Sequence Number5895750
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948022645
UDI-Public815948022645
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K201271
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/02/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/24/2025
Device Catalogue NumberBMX9690BER125
Device Lot NumberH00001382
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/23/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/14/2005
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/21/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/25/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient SexUnknown
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-