|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional pro-code: hrx.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.The investigation could not be completed.No conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported, that on unknown date while performing a ria, the surgeon noticed that he was aggressively reaming the medial cortex of the femur.He stopped 1/3 of the distance of the femur with a 12mm reamer head, and then went down to a 10mm ria head and encountered the resistance.The surgeon was concerned that he was too aggressive with the reamer size.However, we measured 14mm on the ruler and started with a 12mm.The surgeon consulted other surgeons as to whether or not he should prophylactically nail the femur.However, he decided not to since he was going to not let the patient bare weight for 3 months.It is unknown if there was a surgical delay.Procedure and patient outcome were unknown.This complaint involves two (2) devices.This report is for one (1) 12.0mm reamer head for ria 2 sterile.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|