| Model Number |
200-22-09 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unstable (1667); Material Deformation (2976); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Emotional Changes (1831); Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Osteolysis (2377); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Balance Problems (4401); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
09/18/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported from the legal department that on (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent revision of the left knee device secondary to ongoing osteolysis due to polyethylene liner wear resulting in aseptic loosening of the femoral and tibial components and bone grafting of the femur.It is also stated that despite undergoing the revision surgery, the patient experiences daily knee pain and discomfort which limit activities of daily living and recreation and impacts quality of life.There is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no information on the surgical procedure or patient outcome.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D2b, knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.Concomitant medical products : 2429019 200-02-32 - three peg patella 32mm.2559397 204-04-22 - trapezoid tibial tray sz 1f/2t, 2f/2t.2382142 230-02-02 - optetrak asy,cr cemented femoral, sz 2.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated: g3, h6.The following sections were corrected: h6.Mdr section codes updated/corrected: a, b, c, d, e, g.The reason for the revision reported cannot be confirmed from the information provided but may be the result of prosthesis wear, instability, and femoral loosening or due to inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Additionally, a contributing factor to the reported wear may have been the result of being packaged in a non-conforming vacuum bag for more than five years.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and images and radiographs were not provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|