MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. JOURN ART INS BCS STD 5-6 RT 9; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

Model Number	74023251
Medical Device Problem Code	Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Failure of Implant (1924); Loss of Range of Motion (2032)
Date of Event	02/27/2023
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after total knee arthroplasty was performed on an unknown date, patient experience a knee locked up about 6 months ago, the knee locked up at other times during sleep he moved his leg to the wrong way.This was treated with revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which upon removal, it was noticed the journey i bcs post was broken and replaced with a rev journey art ins bcs std 5 6 rt 10.Patient's current health status is unknown.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after total knee arthroplasty was performed on an unknown date, the patient experienced a locked-up knee about 6 months ago.The knee locked up at other times during sleep when he moved his leg the wrong way.This complication was treated by performing a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which it was noticed that the journey i bcs post was broken.This component was explanted and replaced with a rev journey art ins bcs std 5 6 rt 10.Patient's current health status is unknown.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection revealed post fractured off.The broken post was returned.The visual also reveals scratches, burrs and discoloration on the insert.The device shows signs of wear.The knee insert post deformation and/or fracture may have been due to repeated posterior contact of the femoral cam on the post combined with excessive posterior to anterior shear force during activity.However, this could not be isolated as the root cause for this particular failure mode.Some additional factors that could have contributed to the reported event include patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb and/or traumatic injury.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery could not be determined.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Device batch number was not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history of the previous 12 months revealed similar events for the listed device, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed in warnings and precautions that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.The patient should be warned that the device does not replace normal healthy bone.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with inspection procedure, the final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print.Also, material specification shall control the quality and manufacture of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.H11- corrected data.B2- outcomes attributed to adverse event.B5- describe event or problem.B7- other relevant history.D8 / d9- device available for evaluation, device returned to manufacturer.H6- health effect: clinical and impact codes.

• Brand Name: JOURN ART INS BCS STD 5-6 RT 9
• Common Device Name: PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
• Manufacturer (Section D): SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.; 1450 brooks rd.; memphis TN 38116
• Manufacturer (Section G): SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.; 1450 brooks rd.; memphis TN 38116
• Manufacturer Contact: holly topping ; 7000 west william cannon drive; austin, TX 78735 ; 5123913905
• MDR Report Key: 16607404
• Report Number: 1020279-2023-00651
• Device Sequence Number: 17337712
• Product Code: JWH
• UDI-Device Identifier: 03596010555137
• UDI-Public: 03596010555137
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: TX
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K042515
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Explanted Year: 2023
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Health Professional,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 06/22/2023

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: 74023251
• Device Catalogue Number: 74023251
• Device Lot Number: UNKNOWN
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 02/27/2023
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 06/15/2023
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 03/23/2023
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 06/22/2023
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Hospitalization; Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 73 YR
• Patient Sex: Male