|
A customer from the united states observed elevated erroneous calcium (ca) results on multiple patient samples on atellica ch 930 analyzer.The samples were repeated on a atellica ch 930 analyzer.The repeat results were lower than the discordant results.The repeat results were reported, as the correct results, to the physician(s).Siemens reviewed available information to evaluate for a potential product problem.Repeat of the same samples yielded expected results.Therefore, return of the patient samples is not warranted for further investigation.Biorad mulitqual lot 56690 peer data: l1 peer x(sd) = 5.8(0.21) 2sd range 5.4-6.2 3sd range 5.2-6.4 mg/dl.L3 peer x(sd) = 13.6(0.34) 2sd range 12.9-14.3 3sd range 12.6-14.6 mg/dl.A lot calibration with calibration id 3918 was performed on (b)(6) 2023 at 05:09 for atellica ch ca lot 221732 pack sequence 0,5029.Qc recovery was within acceptable limits; l1 = 5.9-6.0, l3 = 13.8-13.9 mg/dl.A pack calibration with calibration id 3940 was performed on (b)(6) 2023 at 05:11 for atellica ch ca lot 221732 pack sequence 1,5029.Qc recovery was within acceptable limits; l1 = 5.5-5.8, l3 = 13.3-13.8 mg/dl.On (b)(6) 2023 at 10:54, pack sequence 1,5029 was consumed and the pack calibration expired.The system moved to a new pack for atellica ch ca lot 221732 with sequence 0,5054.When this pack was placed into use, the system uses the lot calibration with calibration id 3918.Qc recovery was elevated and out of range; l1 = 6.5-6.7 l3 = 14.7-14.8 mg/dl.On (b)(6) 2023 at 08:54, the operator performed a lot calibration with calibration id 3949 for atellica ch ca lot 221732 sequence 0,5054.Qc recovery was within acceptable limits: l1 = 5.9, l3 = 13.1 mg/dl.Siemens review of the calibration indicates the absorbance was higher than previous calibration absorbances for atellica ch ca lot 221732.On (b)(6) 2023 at 15:05, pack sequence 0,5054 was consumed and the system moved to pack sequence 1,5054 using the same lot calibration with calibration id 3949.Qc recovery shifted low and out of acceptable range; l1 = 5.0 l3 = 12.3 mg/dl.On (b)(6) 2023 at 07:17, a lot calibration with calibration id 3957 was performed on pack sequence 1,5054.Qc was within acceptable limits; l1 = 5.8, l3 = 13.9 mg/dl.Qc recovery has been within acceptable limits since this calibration with subsequent reagent packs.Siemens concludes the probable cause of discordant atellica ch ca results for multiple samples is most likely due to an isolated incident of a compromised or contaminated well 0 with pack sequence 5054.The data suggests atellica ch ca lot 221732 pack sequence 0,5054 was compromised or contaminated and the issue was calibrated into the calibration of the lot calibration with calibration id 3949.Well 2 of the same pack sequence 1,5054 performed acceptably after the pack was recalibrated to set the calibration back to be consistent with previous calibrations with reagent lot 221732.All other pack wells of atellica ch ca lot 221732 perform as expected suggesting this issue is isolated to pack well 0,5054.The potential of leakage of well 0 of pack sequence 5054 is unknown and cannot be determined.Siemens has reviewed the information provided and concludes that it is not a reagent lot or method issue.No sample was required to be sent to siemens for further investigation.There is no evidence of a potential product issue.The instrument is fully operational.Mdr 1219913-2023-00060 was filed for a different date of the same event.
|
|
The customer observed elevated erroneous calcium (ca) results on multiple patient samples on atellica ch 930 analyzer.The discordant results were reported to the physician(s).The samples were repeated on a atellica ch 930 analyzer.The repeat results were lower than the discordant results.The repeat results were reported, as the correct results, to the physician(s).There are no known reports of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the discordant ca results.
|