|
MERZ NORTH AMERICA, INC RADIESSE INJECTABLE IMPLANT; IMPLANT, DERMAL, FOR AESTHETIC USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
8071M0K2 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
03/06/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This spontaneous report was received from a us physician and concerns a patient.The patients initials, gender and date of birth were unknown.The patient was injected with a total of 1.5 ml of radiesse(+), into the cheeks (off label use of device), on (b)(6) 2023.Batch number and expiry date were unknown.The patient was injected with 0.75 ml of radiesse(+) into each cheek.Concomitant medication included aspirin.On (b)(6) 2023, at the time of the radiesse(+) injection, the patient experienced noticeable bruising and redness.In (b)(6) 2023, the patient had cheek swelling.The physician wanted to talk with someone regarding the cheek swelling.The patient had a possible occlusion by radiesse(+).Corrective treatment included doxycycline and laser treatment.Bruising and redness improved in the days following the treatment.Due to the provided information, the outcome of the event was considered as resolving.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This case was assessed as reportable to the fda as the event possible occlusion (vascular occlusion) was deemed to meet serious injury criteria of necessitated medical or surgical intervention to preclude permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure.The device history record could not be reviewed as the lot number was not reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Follow-up information was received on 17-apr-2023: the linking sentence was added to the top of the narrative.The suspect product was recoded from radiesse(+) to radiesse.The event acute inflammatory reaction was added.The event term possible occlusion was amended to vascular occlusion and the coding remained unchanged.The patients gender (male), initials, date of birth and age were provided.He was 65 years old at the time of the event.The patient was injected with radiesse.Batch number was reported as 100131227 (expiry date: 07/2023).The batch record review was received and the lot number for radiesse was confirmed as 100131227 (expiry date: 07/2023).A lot search in the global safety database was conducted.The patient was previously injected with radiesse, into the cheeks, a few years prior to this report.He had no adverse events.The patients medical history included no major illnesses.He was already taking aspirin for prophylactic purposes.On (b)(6) 2023, after the radiesse injection, the patient experienced some swelling on right cheek.Some acute inflammatory reaction versus vascular occlusion was considered.On (b)(6) 2023, the patent was told to follow up and started prednisone and doxycycline.Aspirin was continued.On (b)(6) 2023, swelling reduced and hence aerolse laser treatment was provided for bruising and to improve circulation in the area.They maintained a connection with the patient on a daily basis and the cheeks swelling and bruising continued improving.On (b)(6) 2023, he was followed up in the office and the area looked minimally swollen and bruising was resolving too.A few minutes of light emitting diode led) light therapy to improve inflammation and exilis ultra treatment was provided as well for 5 min to improve circulation and healing.The reporter kept in touch with the patient and his swelling and bruising resolved completely in few days.Complete resolution was reported, on (b)(6) 2023.The outcome of the event vascular occlusion was reported as resolved, after 7 days, on (b)(6) 2023 (changed from resolving).The outcome of the event inflammatory reaction was reported as resolved, after 7 days, on (b)(6) 2023.Follow-up information was received on 26-apr-2023: the case was downgraded to non-serious.The event vascular occlusion was deleted.The reporter informed that the vascular occlusion was ruled out, due to a normal capillary refill and rapid recovery with antibiotics and steroids which were given to the patient to accelerate the inflammatory reaction.The inflammatory reaction was noted in form of immediate swelling soon after the treatment with radiesse.The outcome of the event acute inflammatory reaction remained unchanged.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This case was assessed as non-reportable to the fda as the event possible occlusion (vascular occlusion) was deleted due to a normal capillary refill and rapid recovery.This case was assessed as non-serious.The device history record of radiesse injectable implant, lot number 100131227, was reviewed.A lot search was conducted on the reported lot and no similar events were noted.No nonconformances reports, corrective/preventive actions related to this lot.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|