|
DEPUY MITEK LLC US MINILOK QA+ W/ #0 OCORD AND OS-2 NEEDLE W/BIT; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
212849 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/06/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).Reporter is a j&j sales representative.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep in south korea that during an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the tip of the handle on the minilok qa+ w/ #0 ocord and os-2 needle w/bit device was broken.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwath, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device has not been returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, the anchor appeared to be broken and it was not in place.This complaint can be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number 9l37818, and no nonconformances were identified.The photo provided does not contain enough evidence to determine why the customer experienced the failure, hands on analysis should provide the required evidence to provide a root cause.As per ifu; do not twist or apply bending force to the inserter.Doing so may damage the anchor, suture, or inserter tip.Excessive tension may overload the anchor or suture.The possible root cause for the issue reported can be attributed to excessive force and twist applied during procedure.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Visual observations revealed that the anchor was received separately from the inserter.The inserted was broken and deformed.No anomalies were found in the anchor.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number 9l37818, and no nonconformances were identified.Based on the condition of the device reiceved, this complaint can be confirmed.As per ifu; do not twist or apply bending force to the inserter.Doing so may damage the anchor, suture, or inserter tip.Excessive tension may overload the anchor or suture.The possible root cause for the issue reported can be attributed to excessive force and twist applied during procedure.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|