• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL HD ARTHROSCOPE/SINUSCOPE 4.0MM X 0 DEG X 167MM (MITEK LOCK); RIGID ENDOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL HD ARTHROSCOPE/SINUSCOPE 4.0MM X 0 DEG X 167MM (MITEK LOCK); RIGID ENDOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number 242017
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Scratched Material (3020)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/09/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).The complaint device was received at the manufacturing site and evaluated.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: outer tube damaged, distal tip damaged, distal tip fiber damaged.Broken lenses in optical system.Per service reports, this complaint can be confirmed.The defective parts needs to be replaced to resolve the issues.As part of depuy mitek¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The faulty parts was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history review: manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by sales rep that during a knee arthroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the hd arthroscope/sinuscope 4.0mm x 0 deg x 167mm (mitek lock) device was scratched.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the device had broken lenses in its optical system.Another like device was used to complete the procedure with less than five minutes delay.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HD ARTHROSCOPE/SINUSCOPE 4.0MM X 0 DEG X 167MM (MITEK LOCK)
Common Device Name
RIGID ENDOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key16674358
Report Number1221934-2023-01472
Device Sequence Number15113762
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705029143
UDI-Public10886705029143
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K080560
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number242017
Device Catalogue Number242017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/16/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/31/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-