• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. DISPOSABLE BENDING CANNULA; DISPOSABLE CANNULA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. DISPOSABLE BENDING CANNULA; DISPOSABLE CANNULA Back to Search Results
Model Number PR-233Q
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001); Pancreatitis (4481)
Date of Event 04/21/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Event or Problem Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled, "single-operator peroral cholangioscopy cystic duct cannulation for transpapillary gallbladder stent placement in patients with acute cholecystitis at moderate to high surgical risk (with videos)".Background: one of the main reasons for failed endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (etgs) under fluoroscopic guidance is the inability to cannulate the cystic duct.Single-operator peroral cholangioscopy (soc)-assisted etgs is an adjunct technique to facilitate etgs.We aimed to demonstrate its efficacy.Methods: between 2015 and 2019, 104 patients with acute cholecystitis at moderate to high surgical risk underwent etgs, which involved 3 steps: (1) cystic duct cannulation under fluoroscopic guidance with or without additional soc guidance; (2) guidewire placement; and (3) stent placement in the gallbladder.The technical success rate was determined when stent placement was confirmed endoscopically and radiographically.Results: of 104 patients, 55 (53%) patients had successful etgs under fluoroscopic guidance.Of 49 patients who had failed fluoroscopy-guided etgs, 41 patients underwent additional soc-assisted etgs and 5 patients proceeded to other interventions.Of patients who underwent soc-assisted etgs (n z 41), 23 (56%) cystic cannulation followed by stent placement were successful; cystic duct cannulations, guidewire, and stent placement failed in 8, 9, and 1 patients, respectively.The overall technical success rate of etgs increased from 53% (55 of 104) to 75% (78 of 104) after additional soc assistance.Adverse events and recurrence were not different between patients who underwent etgs under fluoroscopic guidance and those who underwent soc-assisted etgs.Conclusions: in patients with acute cholecystitis who are not surgical candidates, soc-assisted etgs can increase the technical success rate after failed fluoroscopic guidance.Soc can help for the cystic duct cannulation and guidewire placement steps but not for the stent placement step.Type of adverse events/number of patients bleeding - 3 patients perforation due to guidewire - 2 patients pancreatitis - 1 patient *fever was reported in 2 patient, and considered a non-serious event.This literature article requires 2 reports.The related patient identifiers are as follows: (b)(6) (pr-233q).(b)(6) (tjf-q180v).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse events cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DISPOSABLE BENDING CANNULA
Common Device Name
DISPOSABLE CANNULA
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer (Section G)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16679177
Report Number9614641-2023-00464
Device Sequence Number8116149
Product Code ODD
UDI-Device Identifier04953170044243
UDI-Public04953170044243
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryTH
PMA/510(K) Number
K011149
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberPR-233Q
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/05/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/10/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/04/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
NON-OLYMPUS: GLO-TIP; NON-OLYMPUS: SPYGLASS; NON-OLYMPUS: ULTRATOME XL; NON-OLYMPUS: VISIGLIDE
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-