| Model Number |
PDL-M-SP03S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Expulsion (2933)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
03/15/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It was reported that a patient was implanted with two prodisc l devices at l4/l5 and l5/s1 on (b)(6) 2021.It was found that the poly inlay had expulsed anteriorly from the endplates at the l5/s1 level.The surgeon performed a pdl removal of that level on (b)(6) 2023.Patient was then fused using a cage and posterior pedicle screws.A review of the associated dhrs found no anomalies related to the complaint.Complaint trending found that the rate of complaints is within the poc level defined within the risk documentation.A review of the risk documentation found that the hazard associated with this complaint is identified and mitigated to a level where the benefits outweigh the risks.Device evaluation will be completed by exponent under pdl-rd-0008 using their standard pdl evaluation procedure.It was confirmed that a revision took place due to poly inlay expulsion.No other anomalies associated with the complaint were found during the investigation.This report is for 1 of 3 devices in this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A patient was implanted with two prodisc l devices at l4/l5 and l5/s1 on (b)(6) 2021.It was found that the poly inlay had expulsed anteriorly from the endplates at the l5/s1 level.The surgeon performed a pdl removal of that level on (b)(6) 2023.Patient was then fused using a cage and posterior pedicle screws.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Update to add udi number to report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|