|
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL FMS CURVED ULTRA-AGGRESSIVE BLADE PLUS 4.2MM 5PK; ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER SYSTEM BLADE, SINGLE-USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
283422 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Use of Device Problem (1670); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/20/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).The expiration date is currently unavailable.The device manufacture date is currently unavailable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by a healthcare professional in switzerland that during an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2023, a fms curved ultra-aggressive blade plus 4.2mm 5pk device was used.According to the report, the inner part of the shaver was covered with a plastic layer; and therefore, the suction through the shaver was not possible.It was unknown if and how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwtch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the complaint device was returned and evaluated.The device was returned in used condition.Upon visual inspection, no structural anomalies were observed.The center shaft can be rotated with no restriction.No plastic layer was found, or any other type of matter was found inside the center shaft that can interfere with the suction function.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 9l50815 number, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.According with the visual inspection result, this complaint cannot be confirmed.The device did not show any structural discrepancy and no evidence of obstruction was found in the device.Therefore we can conclude that the device has no issue.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|