|
This mdr is related to mdr 3013840437-2023-00039 referring to the same patient.This spontaneous report was received from a us health care professional and concerns a female patient.The patients initials and date of birth were reported as unknown.She was injected with 3 syringes of radiesse(+), into several areas.Batch number was reported as a00061720 (expiry date: 06/2024).A lot search in the global safety database was conducted.The batch record review was received and the lot number for radiesse(+) was confirmed as a00061720 (expiry date: 06/2024).Radiesse(+) was hyper diluted (product preparation issue, off label use of device).As reported, an off label technique was used.The patient previously used radiesse(+) for years, and was experienced with hyper diluted radiesse (as reported).She never had that problem before.The patients medical history included fine lines.After the treatment with radiesse(+), the patient experienced no improvement and that her skin almost looked worse.She had little to no result and her fine lines appeared worse.Her skin looked very dehydrated.The outcome of the events was unknown.Follow-up information was received on 28-mar-2023: this case was upgraded to serious.The event term little to no result was amended to zero improvement.The coding was changed from device effect decreased to device ineffective.Causality for the events skin wrinkling and condition aggravated were reassessed.The patients initials, age, date of birth and weight (65.77 kg) were provided.She was 56 years old at the time of the events.The patient was injected, with 1.5 ml of radiesse(+), on (b)(6) 2022.Radiesse(+) was hyper diluted with 3 ml of normal saline (ns) into 3 syringes.The patients medical history included postmenopausal.In(b)(6) 2022 (reported as on (b)(6) 2022), after the treatment with radiesse(+), the patient experienced no improvement and that her skin almost looked worse.In (b)(6) 2022, 3 weeks after the injection, the patient returned for a follow-up and looked worse than she did before the injections.Skin looked dried out, wrinkles were more prevalent, and zero improvement was noted.The patient stated her dissatisfaction.There were no laboratory tests.As reported, no injuries or interventions were given or necessary.Due to the provided information, the outcome of the events skin looked very dehydrated, and fine lines appeared worse was considered as not resolved (changed from unknown).The outcome of the event zero improvement remained unchanged.In the opinion of the reporter, the events were permanent and related to radiesse(+).
|
|
This case was assessed as reportable to the fda, as the event fine lines appeared worse (pt: condition aggravated), was deemed to meet the serious criteria of disability or permanent damage.The device history record for radiesse(+) injectable implant, lot number a00061720, was reviewed.A lot search was conducted on the reported lot and no other similar events were noted.No nonconformances were noted related to this lot.
|