|
ETHICON INC. SFX SPI MCRYL+ UNI 18IN 3-0 SA PS-2 PRM; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYGLCOLIC ACID
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
SXMP1B107 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Inflammation (1932); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 4/11/2023.This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.¿ trade name - irgacare® ¿ active ingredient(s) ¿ triclosan ¿ dosage form ¿ suture/solid/parenteral ¿ strength ¿ = 2360 g/m component code: g07002 device not returned.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is meant by ¿recently, it occurred aggressively with a patient¿? please provide details suture sinus was very prominent and the patient was readmitted to hospital to excise his wound please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure tbc date of index surgical procedure? approximately 6 weeks prior to the revision surgery the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? please explain the question - what was the initial approach for the index surgical procedure? (open, laparoscopic or other)? open - on what tissue was the suture used? skin (subcuticular closure) - what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? normal - was the fixation loop secured to tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? yes - was at least one reverse stitch performed prior to closure? yes - what symptoms did the patient experience following the index surgical procedure? onset date? inflamed scar and stitch sinus - did the patient have an infection? tbc - please describe the patient manifestations of the reported infection (location, severity, appearance, systemic or local infection).Tbc - please provide the onset date/time of infection from the initial surgical procedure.Tbc - were there any pre-existing signs/symptoms of active infection prior to this surgical procedure? tbc - did the patient receive any prophylactic antibiotics pre-, intra- or post-operation? tbc - were cultures performed? if so, please provide the results.Tbc - how much and what type of drainage is present in this wound? tbc - please describe any surgical intervention performed.Please provide details.Tbc - please describe any medical performed including medication name and results.Tbc - did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? tbc - other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? tbc - what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? tbc - what is the patient's current status? tbc - lot number? rpbdpb.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a total knee replacement on an unknown date and a barbed suture was used to close the skin.The patient experienced an inflamed scar a stitch sinus after 4-6 weeks from surgery.It occurred aggressively with the patient.The surgeon had to re-operate on the patient to excise the wound.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: h6 health effect - clinical code.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: this surgeon is used to close the skin with stratafix spiral monocryl plus, then, apply chlorhexidine prep after closure, followed by tegaderm dressing.What is meant by ¿recently, it occurred aggressively with a patient¿? please provide details suture sinus was very prominent and the patient was readmitted to hospital to excise the inflamed / dehisced wound.Please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure young, male, low bmi.Date of index surgical procedure? approximately 6 weeks prior to the revision surgery.The diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? primary, elective total joint replacement.What was the initial approach for the index surgical procedure? (open, laparoscopic or other)? open.On what tissue was the suture used? skin (subcuticular closure).What was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? normal.Was the fixation loop secured to tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? yes.Was at least one reverse stitch performed prior to closure? yes.What symptoms did the patient experience following the index surgical procedure? onset date? inflamed scar and stitch sinus.Did the patient have an infection? no.Please describe the patient manifestations of the reported infection (location, severity, appearance, systemic or local infection).Inflammation and few points of dehiscence along the suture line.Major sites of inflammation are both ends of the incision.Please provide the onset date/time of infection from the initial surgical procedure.Not available- 4 to 6 weeks post surgery.Were there any pre-existing signs/symptoms of active infection prior to this surgical procedure? no.Did the patient receive any prophylactic antibiotics pre-, intra- or post-operation? intra and post op.Were cultures performed? if so, please provide the results.No.How much and what type of drainage is present in this wound? na.Please describe any surgical intervention performed.Please provide details.As previously highlighted, this knee replacement was later followed by wound excision to treat.Please describe any medical performed including medication name and results.Not available.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? no.Other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? na.What is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? as per the surgeon, he noticed that the patients who had complications were of indian origins.Hence, he is questioning if there might be an ethnic/ genetic component predisposing to these complications, reactions to stratafix spiral monocryl plus (previous incidents: (b)(4).What is the patient's current status? recovered.Lot number? rpbdpb.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please provide photos if available what tissue dehisced? please describe the appearance of the suture during the second procedure.Did the suture break post-op? were there any precipitating stress factors for the suture breakage or pulling out of the tissue? corrected information: h6: type of investigation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|