• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN XLPE PS INSERT SZ 7-8 15MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN XLPE PS INSERT SZ 7-8 15MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 71453261
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Joint Laxity (4526)
Date of Event 03/27/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal reference: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a tka surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2013, the patient experienced instability.This adverse event was solved through a revision surgery performed on (b)(6) 2023, in which the post of the lgn xlpe ps insert sz 7-8 15mm was found to be busted off, therefore it was explanted and changed.Patient status is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection revealed the post fractured off.The broken post was returned.The visual also reveals scratches, burrs and discoloration on the insert.The device shows signs of wear.The knee insert post deformation and/or fracture may have been due to repeated posterior contact of the femoral cam on the post combined with excessive posterior to anterior shear force during activity.However, this could not be isolated as the root cause for this particular failure mode.Some additional factors that could have contributed to the reported event include patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb and/or traumatic injury.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on a review of information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported instability was due to the insert post fracture.However, the root cause of the post insert fracture cannot be definitively concluded.No additional supporting documentation for was provided and the patient¿s current health status remains unknown.The patient impact beyond the reported post fracture and subsequent revision cannot be determined.Therefore, no further clinical/medical assessment can be rendered.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed in warnings and precautions that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.The patient should be warned that the device does not replace normal healthy bone.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with inspection drawing, the final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print.Also, per material specification, the quality and manufacture ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (uhmwpe) bar stock shall be controlled.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LGN XLPE PS INSERT SZ 7-8 15MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key16718661
Report Number1020279-2023-00796
Device Sequence Number11210051
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556255773
UDI-Public00885556255773
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K071071
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2013
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/28/2021
Device Model Number71453261
Device Catalogue Number71453261
Device Lot Number11GM00235
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/27/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/16/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/11/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2011
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device A
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight75 KG
-
-