| Model Number |
04.315.125 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
03/23/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from depuy synthes reports an event in israel as follows: it was reported that during the initial surgery performed on (b)(6) 2023 everything went well.About 2 weeks later the surgeon noticed that the device isn't working properly.The device is designed for mandibular distraction but the device's activator didn't function well.The surgeon has noticed that the device did stretch, but later on returned to his previous state.Revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2023.No further information is provided.This report is for one (1) removable extension arm-flex 40mm for cmf distractor this is report 2 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional narrative: additional device product code: pbj.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.A2: patient age reported as one and a half years.D10: date of concomitant therapy is (b)(6)2023.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was further reported that: on (b)(6)2023, a surgery was performed on a toddler (one and a half years old) during which the curvilinear distraction system was used on both sides of the patient's jaw.In the examination performed by the surgeon at the end of the surgery, the system operated intact on both sides of the jaw (right and left).On the second day after the surgery, while the patient was hospitalized, the first distraction was performed.According to the surgeon, this distraction was successful, and no problems were noticed with the distraction and the patient was discharged home after the patient's mother was instructed how to continue performing the distractions at home.On (b)(6)2023, the first follow-up took place, during which an additional distraction of the device was performed on both sides of the jaw.Distraction was intact and no problems with system were observed.On (b)(6)2023, a second follow-up took place, during which an x-ray was taken; there was observed evidence of jaw distraction on the right side, but not on the left side.In addition, slight swelling was reported on the left side of the patient's jaw.During this follow-up, the surgeon made sure that the device was well fixed and that the mother performed the distractions properly.The patient was discharged home.On (b)(6)2023, a third follow-up was performed, during which it was observed that the left side of the jaw did not distract as expected.It was decided to perform a revision surgery.On (b)(6)2023, the revision surgery was carried out, during which the system on the left side was replaced with an identical left-side system of the same type.According to the surgeon, the revision surgery was completed to his satisfaction and in the follow-up visit that took place after the revision, (b)(6)2023, it was evident that there was distraction on both sides.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h4, h6: part 04.315.125, lot 54p3174: part manufacture date: october 28, 2020.Manufacturing location: brandywine.A review of the device history record of this lot revealed no complaint-related anomalies.The product lot met all specification criteria at the time of release with no issues documented that would contribute to the complaint condition.H3, h6: a product investigation was completed: visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the device was returned in an assembled condition.No damage or defects were observed with flexible arm.A functional test to assess the allegation of will not distract was conducted.The flexible arm was turned clockwise and then anticlockwise and the plate moved with no sign of problems.The complaint condition was not replicated.The current and manufactured drawings were reviewed.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the observed condition would not contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|