|
The customer reported a false positive reaction of a donor sample with the blood grouping reagent seraclone anti-c (rh2).The customer stated that the donor was previously tested as c-antigen negative several times in the past.The customer returned a product sample of the supposedly defective seraclone anti-c lot for investigational testing and additionally two segments of the donor in question.First, our quality control laboratory tested the product sample returned by the customer in parallel with their retention sample for potency and specificity.All acceptance criteria were met.The minimum titer 16 was exceeded.A review of the batch record documentation showed no irregularities which might have negatively affected the quality of the allegedly defective lot.Then ourquality control laboratory tested the segments with the complaint sample and the retention sample according to the instruction for use (ifu) with an incubation for 10 minutes at room temperature.Both segments showed positive reactions.Because the complaint sample was exhausted only the retention sample was used for the further testing: the segments were incubated only five minutes at room temperature.Again, the reactions were clearly positive.Additionally, the segments were tested with the reference lots of seraclone anti-c according to the ifu.Again, the segments showed positive reactions in all tests.Furthermore, the segments of the donor were tested with different anti-c reagents, among others in the ih system and the id system.In all cases the segments showed clearly positive reactions with anti-c.Based on the investigation the complaint was classified as undetermined.The complaint sample as well as the retention sample reacted as expected.All acceptance criteria regarding potency and specificity were met.The segments of the donor in question showed positive reactions with the complaint sample as well as with the retention sample of the supposedly defective lot.The donor's segments also reacted positively with all other anti-c reagents used.Therefore, we strongly suspect that the donor is not c antigen negative, but the c antigen was present but probably a variant or polymorphism was present.A molecular genetic determination could bring clarity here.This was not possible with the available material, as segments are not suitable for molecular genetic analysis.
|