|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that this case reports a revision with the replacement of a meta-nail tibial device with a new meta-nail device which was reportedly performed due to non-union.Per case details, ¿no injury to the patient¿ was reported.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have definitively contributed to the event.The patient impact beyond the reported cannot be determined and the patient¿s current health status is unknown.Therefore, no further clinical/medical assessment can be rendered.Should any additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for the intramedullary nail system revealed that the care prior to bony union section stablish to immobilize and/or externally support skeletal structures that have been implanted with surgical metallic implants until skeletal union is observed.Early weight bearing substantially increases implant loading and increases the risk of loosening, bending or breaking the device.Early weight bearing should only be considered where there are stable fractures with good bone-to-bone contact.Patients who are obese and/or noncompliant, as well as patients who could be pre-disposed to delayed or non-union, should have auxiliary support.The implant may be exchanged for a larger, stronger nail subsequent to the management of soft tissue injuries.Patients and nursing care providers should be advertised of these risks.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include excessive pressure on the joint, injury, procedural/user error, surgical/post operative complications, healing issues and/or patient condition.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|