| Model Number |
G32537 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Advance (2524); Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/29/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The proximal piece would not advance as it was being advanced over the stiff wire.Therefore, an evar was performed to successfully complete the procedure.When the proximal piece was being prepped and flushed, the technician bent the sheath and in turn it is believed (by both the sales representative and the physician) that the technician bent the inner cannula.The bend was where the graft material starts.At that certain area, they believe that the inner cannula is compressed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The proximal piece would not advance as it was being advanced over the stiff wire.Therefore, an evar was performed to successfully complete the procedure.When the proximal piece was being prepped and flushed, the technician bent the sheath and in turn it is believed (by both the sales representative and the physician) that the technician bent the inner cannula.The bend was where the graft material starts.At that certain area, they believe that the inner cannula is compressed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was returned for evaluation.The complete device was returned and appeared bowed.All components were inspected for non-conformances.The graft was deployed in order to be able to observe the inner cannula.A significant kink at the proximal end of the inner cannula just below the top cap was observed.Additional information was received from the sales representative.A lunderquist wire guide was used.No conduit was used.Dilators were used in the access vessels.A vascular closure device was used prior to access.A review of the device history record found that the work order for lot ac1128279 appears complete and correct and the quality control inspection was verified to ensure that the device passed inspection.There were no non-conformances raised or temporary deviations in place at the time of manufacture.A review of the manufacturing records and/or specifications did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The investigation concludes the complaint device was manufactured to specification.Review of the instructions for use (ifu) supplied with the device found that it contains appropriate instructions for proper placement of the device.There is evidence to suggest that user did not follow the ifu which states: ¿do not bend or kink the delivery system.Doing so may cause damage to the delivery system and the zenith fenestrated aaa endovascular graft.¿ the device was used outside of its validated state therefore the integrity of the device is compromised.It is unknown how the device will function outside of its validated state.A definitive root cause was identified as bending of the inner cannula during preparation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|