|
The following devices were also listed in this report: 6.5 cancellous bone; cat# 2030-6515-1; lot# unknown.C-taper cocr lfit head 22mm/0; cat# 06-2200; lot# unknown.Trident psl with purefix ha 46mm; cat# 542-11-46d; lot# unknown.Secur-fit max 132 hip stem #6; cat# 6051-0625s; lot# unknown.Acetabular dome hole plug; cat# 2060-0000-1; lot# unknown.Modular dual mobility insert; cat# 626-00-38d; lot# unknown.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.Reported event: an event regarding instability involving an adm liner was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results:.Material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: i have had the opportunity to review documentation related to pi including the product inquiry summary, an undated surgical implant record, an x-ray report dated (b)(6) 2021, an mri report dated (b)(6) 2021, an x-ray report dated (b)(6) 2021, an ap pelvis x-ray dated (b)(6) 2021, and operative report dated (b)(6) 2017.The event description from the product inquiry summaries states: patient states she is experiencing instability of her left hip.Primary posterior left hip surgery performed on (b)(6) 2017 and patient has had instability issues since surgery.{patient is scheduled for a left hip revision on (b)(6) 2023.She experienced a fall in 2021 and tore her left hamstring and experienced mild edema however a dislocation was ruled out via x-ray.Patient inquiring if products are for recall.The primary operative report describes an uncomplicated left tha.The three x-ray reports describe the hip to be without mechanical complication or loosening.The mri describes a partial thickness hamstring tear.The ap pelvis x-ray shows a cemented stem and pressfit acetabulum.The acetabulum appears to be in expected position.The stem is in varus.No objective documentation was proved to confirm instability or dislocation.Instability of a primary left tha cannot be confirmed.Should additional information become available i would be happy to further this assessment.Device history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: i have had the opportunity to review documentation related to pi including the product inquiry summary, an undated surgical implant record, an x-ray report dated (b)(6) 2021, an mri report dated (b)(6) 2021, an x-ray report dated (b)(6) 2021, an ap pelvis x-ray dated (b)(6) 2021, and operative report dated (b)(6) 2017.The event description from the product inquiry summaries states: patient states she is experiencing instability of her left hip.Primary posterior left hip surgery performed on (b)(6) 2017 and patient has had instability issues since surgery.{patient is scheduled for a left hip revision on (b)(6) 2023.She experienced a fall in 2021 and tore her left hamstring and experienced mild edema however a dislocation was ruled out via x-ray.Patient inquiring if products are for recall.The primary operative report describes an uncomplicated left tha.The three x-ray reports describe the hip to be without mechanical complication or loosening.The mri describes a partial thickness hamstring tear.The ap pelvis x-ray shows a cemented stem and pressfit acetabulum.The acetabulum appears to be in expected position.The stem is in varus.No objective documentation was proved to confirm instability or dislocation.Instability of a primary left tha cannot be confirmed.Should additional information become available i would be happy to further this assessment.It is also noted that the patient inquired if any of the devices are subject to a product recall.As no lot information was provided it cannot be determined is any of the reported devices are subject to a product recall.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.Device not returned.
|