|
|
| Catalog Number |
0134460 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/02/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no, expiry date, udi no.), d6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol -composix l/p mesh (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol - composix l/p mesh (device 2) note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: 25-sep-2009 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of two composix l/p mesh (device 1 and 2).Per op notes, "an incision was made to the left lower abdomen, two composix l/p mesh (device 1 and 2) were placed using prolene sutures." (b)(6) 2022 - patient was diagnosed with large bowel obstruction thereby underwent repair with partial removal of mesh and extensive lysis of adhesions.Per op notes, "there were dense adhesions in the prior mesh, all of these were lysed.Also had a recurrent incisional hernia in the left upper quadrant.Some of the hernia mesh had to be removed." (b)(6) 2022 - patient was diagnosed with large bowel obstruction and wound infection thereby underwent repair with removal of mesh (device 1 and 2), lysis of adhesions.Per op notes, "adhesions were taken down, identified the wound infection.The mesh (device 1 and 2) were completely removed.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|