• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/21/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), a non-penumbra microcatheter, and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing the red72 over the microcatheter and the guidewire.While retracting the red72 after completing the first pass, the physician experienced resistance again.Subsequently, after removal of the red72, the physician noticed that it was broken and stretched at the distal end.Therefore, the red72 was no longer used in the procedure.The procedure was completed using a penumbra system red 62 reperfusion catheter (red62), the same neuron max, the same microcatheter, and the same guidewire.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed that the device was stretched and fractured on its distal shaft.If the red72 is retracted against resistance during use, damage such as stretching and subsequent fracture may occur.Based on the reported event, the root cause of the resistance could not be determined.Further evaluation of the device revealed a kink near its distal tip.This damage is likely incidental to the reported complaint and root cause of this damage could not be determined.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key16773583
Report Number3005168196-2023-00177
Device Sequence Number12467606
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948023918
UDI-Public815948023918
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIN
PMA/510(K) Number
K211654
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/07/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/22/2025
Device Catalogue NumberRED72
Device Lot NumberH00001197
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/25/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/27/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/19/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/23/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-