MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG VENOVO VENOUS STENT

Model Number	VENUM20100
Medical Device Problem Codes	Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Deformation (2976); Activation Failure (3270)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event	03/27/2023
Type of Reportable Event	Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure, the stent was allegedly stuck for a couple of seconds.There was no reported patient injury.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: a voluntary recall has been initiated for the venovo¿ venous stent system 9f which was product catalog/lot number specific.Reportedly the proximal end of the stent does not immediately expand upon deployment.The proximal end of the stent remains connected to the delivery system.As a result of the field action, this event is being reported as a malfunction reportable event.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 10/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: a voluntary recall has been initiated for the venovo¿ venous stent system 9f which was product catalog/lot number specific.Reportedly the proximal end of the stent does not immediately expand upon deployment.The proximal end of the stent remains connected to the delivery system.As a result of the field action, this event is being reported as a malfunction reportable event.H10: manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation.The condition of the returned delivery system confirms an expansion issue.The stent brake of the inner catheter which is under the stent was found with significant imprints and damage on its surface; this is considered an indication that the stent adhered to the stent brake immediately after deployment.A detailed description of the expansion behavior of the stent over time to complete expansion is not possible based on investigation of the returned device.Two provided x-ray images cannot confirm stent mangling nor difficult removal.Based on the information available the investigation is closed with confirmed result for stent expansion issue.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of the relevant instruction for use for this product was conducted.The instruction for use was found to address potential worst case complications and adverse events potentially related to expansion issue such as incorrect positioning of the stent requiring further stenting or surgery, intimal injury, stent fracture, and malposition.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 10/2024), g3, h6 (device) h11: e1, e3, e4, g2, h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure through the common iliac and external iliac veins via the left popliteal vein, the stent was allegedly stuck for a couple of seconds.It was further reported that the physician had to twist the deployment device to get the stent to fully open in the vein, but the stent did not fully deploy properly.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: a voluntary recall has been initiated for the venovo¿ venous stent system 9f which was product catalog/lot number specific.Reportedly the proximal end of the stent does not immediately expand upon deployment.The proximal end of the stent remains connected to the delivery system.As a result of the field action, this event is being reported as a malfunction reportable event.H10: manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation.The condition of the returned delivery system confirms an expansion issue.The stent brake of the inner catheter which is under the stent was found with significant imprints and damage on its surface; this is considered an indication that the stent adhered to the stent brake immediately after deployment.A detailed description of the expansion behavior of the stent over time to complete expansion is not possible based on investigation of the returned device.Two provided x-ray images cannot confirm stent mangling nor difficult removal.Based on the information available the investigation is closed with confirmed result for stent expansion issue.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of the relevant instruction for use for this product was conducted.The instruction for use was found to address potential worst case complications and adverse events potentially related to expansion issue such as incorrect positioning of the stent requiring further stenting or surgery, intimal injury, stent fracture, and malposition.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 10/2024), g3 h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure through the common iliac and external iliac veins via the left popliteal vein, the stent was allegedly stuck for a couple of seconds.It was further reported that the physician had to twist the deployment device to get the stent to fully open in the vein, but the stent did not fully deploy properly.Reportedly, the stent was mangled and difficult to be removed.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.

• Brand Name: VENOVO VENOUS STENT
• Common Device Name: VENOUS STENT
• Manufacturer (Section D): ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG; wachhausstr. 6; karlsruhe 76227 ; GM 76227
• Manufacturer (Section G): ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG; wachhausstr. 6; karlsruhe 76227 ; GM 76227
• Manufacturer Contact: brett curtice ; 800 w. rio salado pkwy; tempe, AZ 85281 ; 4803032689
• MDR Report Key: 16789934
• Report Number: 9681442-2023-00151
• Device Sequence Number: 5692131
• Product Code: QAN
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741103865
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741103865
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: CO
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: P180037
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Nurse
• Remedial Action: Recall
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 07/11/2023

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: VENUM20100
• Device Catalogue Number: VENUM20100
• Device Lot Number: ANGX0768
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Initial
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 03/27/2023
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 06/30/2023; 07/13/2023
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 04/21/2023
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 07/04/2023; 07/17/2023
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Yes
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement: Z-1897-2021
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Age: 56 YR
• Patient Sex: Male
• Patient Weight: 77 KG
• Patient Ethnicity: Non Hispanic
• Patient Race: White